Title : JOBSHIELD ANALYTICS: COMPARING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES IN FRAUD DETECTION

Author : Harika gajjala, Chinnam shiva shankar,Mohd afroz ahmed

Abstract :

In recent times, the proliferation of modern technology and widespread social communication has led to a surge in job advertisements, making the detection of fake job postings a critical concern. Predicting the authenticity of job posts poses substantial challenges in the realm of classification tasks. This study proposes leveraging various data mining techniques and classification algorithms, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes Classifier, Random Forest Classifier, Multilayer Perceptron, and Deep Neural Network (DNN), to discern whether a job post is genuine or fraudulent. The experimentation is conducted on the Employment Scam Aegean Dataset (EMSCAD), comprising 18,000 samples. Notably, the Deep Neural Network emerges as a formidable classifier, exhibiting exceptional performance in this classification task. The employed DNN architecture comprises three dense layers, achieving an impressive classification accuracy of approxim

[ PDF ]

Indexing

Impact Indexing 2 Google Index Indexing 4 Indexing 5

Submit Article

Email: editor@ijeri.info

International Journal of Engineering Research & Informatics (IJERI)
E-ISSN: 2348-6481

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: © 2014–2025. All rights reserved to IJERI. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal and personal use by subscribers is granted by the copyright holder. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying such as reproduction for general distribution, resale, or use in derivative works.

DISCLAIMER: The Publisher and the Editorial Board of IJERI shall not be held responsible for any errors, inaccuracies, or consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal. The views and opinions expressed in published articles are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Publisher or Editors.